Good News: Matthias Rath Drops Legal Case Against Goldacre and Guardian

September 12, 2008 at 8:58 pm (Bad Science, Dangerously Wrong, Legal Chill, Nutritionism, Supplements) (, , , , , )

Perhaps I should have maverickly titled this post “To the tune of one million dollars”. Perhaps not. [But, ah... the memories] Anyhoo, the story I’m writing about boils down to this: vitamin pill entrepeneur Matthias Rath had threatened to sue Ben Goldacre and the Guardian newspaper for $1,000,000 and, happily, has now pulled out of this case. Rath ‘failed the AIDS test’ – and in South Africa, a country with major problems not just with AIDS but with AIDS denialism – by promoting vitamin pills instead of antiretroviral drugs for sufferers. Before you finish (or instead of) reading my post, go to badscience.net and read Ben’s account.

I’m no fan of legal chill (or any kind of threats made in order to silence dissent), but this example is particularly egregious and I am delighted to see it being blogged elsewhere – Holford Watch, for a start. [EDIT: The quackometer.net blog has too*] It’s also on the Guardian website here, and here and the Guardian also has a profile of Zackie Achmat here. You can read all about it in tomorrow’s print edition too. And it’s much more fun to frame a newspaper headline than a printed-out blog post – you’re going to want a souvenir. Nutritionism advocates seem be involved in a significant number of these legal threats, such as: Ann Walker of red clover fame; Patrick Holford (who, like Walker, sent legal threats to David Colquhoun and/or his employers); Gillian McKeith, whose lawyer husband claimed John Garrow has defamed his wife. [These are the only nutritionism advocates I can think of at present who have sent such threats - all are detailed (or linked to, at the very least), along with the Society of Homeopaths and the NZ Chiropractors, on the legal chill post I just linked to above.]

It seems this is a major problem with nutritionism advocates. When their ideas or business practices are challenged, they go to the lawyers. Unlike other (or perhaps I should say “more than other”) apologists for an Alternative Therapy, nutritionists set themselves up as men and women of science – if they truly were men and women of science, they would debate as such rather than trying to silence dissent and stifle debate. I am very pleased – not just for Ben Goldacre and the Guardian, but for all of us because these attempts to silence dissent have the potential to harm us as a society.

One more thing – apparently Rath is now moving into Russia. This is very much a bad thing, as “Aids has been on the increase” there. In what seems to be familiar territory subject-wise, Rath recently attacked the pharmaceutical industry in an advertisement:

The Rath Foundation recently expanded its reach into Russia, where Aids has been on the increase. In an advertisement in Izvestia in February, Rath attacked the pharmaceutical industry and suggested that heart attacks, strokes and cancers could be cut to a fraction of the present level through “natural health approaches”.

[From the Guardian story on the affair - here]

Note: This post has been edited to add more information – the original went as far down as the bit on McKeith. The below was added in a more recent edit:

As someone who is employed within the health food and food supplements industry (if I was in marketing, I would have written ‘sector’ there), I wish I was brave enough to put my real name to this but I prefer to blog anonymously to avoid undue hassle: I think Rath’s selling pills to South African AIDS sufferers – and, more importantly, persuading them to stop taking beneficial pharmacetical drugs – was disgusting. If no-one is prepared to address issues as important as Rath selling pills to AIDS sufferers, I doubt there will be any response from members of the food supplements industry to this anytime soon: comment on dcscience. I think I’d like to do it, but I’m afraid that I may be too much of a coward to do so.

*More from Improbable Science, and Gimpy. It seems shpalman has a complete set of links, including forum discussions – you should probably go there or to the Holford Watch post for further reading.

About these ads

6 Comments

  1. One small additional reason to despise Matthias Rath: he sues over good, honest journalism « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science said,

    [...] Now Ben Goldacre has blogged this story about Matthias Rath, and JDC has joined in the fun. Shortly followed by the [...]

  2. Ben Goldacre and The Guardian triumph over murderous Matthias Rath « gimpy’s blog said,

    [...] of the situation from Holfordwatch, Quackometer and jdc325 [...]

  3. SubMoron said,

    Rath had an advertisement in Izvestia? How nice; they used to say that there’s no news in Pravda (“Truth”) and no truth in Izvestia (“News”).

  4. The gripes of Rath said,

    [...] And a lot of publicity from Gimpyblog (”Ben Goldacre and The Guardian triumph over murderous Matthias Rath”), Holfordwatch , Quackometer and jdc325 blogs. [...]

  5. Keeping it unreal « Dr Aust’s Spleen said,

    [...] (and many others, see also here (Gimpy), here (the Quackometer) and here (jdc 325)) [...]

  6. Legal Chill and Other Threats « Stuff And Nonsense said,

    [...] there’s been the famous cases of Simon Singh and the British Chiropractic Association and Matthias Rath versus Ben Goldacre. Today I saw a link to this post by Orac: Doctor’s Data (“more legal [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 405 other followers

%d bloggers like this: